Weird, no I HATE PARIS / SKANK comments there
So if one distro is so much more popular than all the others, the choice is an easy one to make for beginners.
Corn subsidies and sugarcane tariffs. airline safety record
Yes it is set to sink the Titanic much like the iceberg did >>
@heartsblood - Your ignorance and stupidity make me fear for the future of our country.
Why is Jar Jar Binks leading a camel through the desert?
seriously? are you kidding me? this is getting really ridiculous now. I understand some people enjoy the mac look and feel and i also understand that the people who enjoy the mac look and feel run macs. the ubuntu "art team" constantly has revealed themselves to be apple-wannabe "artists". Whatever happened to the day when there was a drive to make your desktop just functional? cde was great (those who say otherwise aren't from a unix background and probably run macs anyway), indigo magic desktop was brilliant, the 98 & 2000 windows gui was incredible and mac has a great desktop as well. but do we really need another what-would-an-ugly-ass-brown-osx-look-like_intrepid_ubuntu1 theme? ***** sake. i think this is only brought to light so well because of the direction of gnome as a whole since the 2.x series came out. 2.x marks the spot where the gnome developers themselves basically regulated themselves to be the makers of a desktop environment that copies EVERYTHING from windows and mac because it's more "friendly" looking. i just.......argh, i guess i'm just ranting. i remember back during my red hat 6.x series days when the gnome desktop was aweseome, functional and friggin fast! now it is just a ***** mac impersonation. blah.
They can simply open a ticket stating the goods were not delivered.
eye row knee